|
| |
|
AN ARTICLE BY MARCUS
STRIFE ABOUT TEEN VIOLENCE |
|
Am important correction has been made
to the references
given in the following essay. Details.
RELATED PAGES
|
Teen Violence and Music: The
Real Connection
contributed by Marcus Strife
(Age 16 from Indiana - Written
2001)
|
Does music
encourage teen violence? This question has acted as a catalyst for a
large and heated debate fueled by weak evidence of a few isolated
incidents in America. In a time of modern witch hunts we need to work
hard to prove that there either is or isn’t a connection. People are
to eager to point a finger and find sense and reason for a few horrible
acts committed by angry teens. What people fail to see is that the
people who commit these crimes are not inspired by music, rather
indignation caused by family or school. No one listens to a song and
then feels the urge to steal or murder. This concept is ridiculous and
parallels the closed-mindedness and rash thinking of the plague, or
ancient China’s burning of the books. Fearful and sheltering parents
have had a literal frenzy attacking music that teens use as a backdrop
to their lives.
Parents see music as a cancer
consuming their innocent children and what morals they still have. They
attack all forms of music except their own; not even the Rolling Stones
are safe from parents. As Prof. Peter Christenson of Lewis and Clark
college states: “music can make a good mood better and allow us to
escape or “work through” a bad one,”(see references below). Music
is mainly used as a background activity; for example, a teen will turn
on music to help them get to sleep or relax. Despite this, parents see
music being associated with pain, sex, and, violence. They use tired and
cliché examples, for example the two boys involved in the Columbine
shooting listened to Linkin-Park and played Doom. The real reason behind
this horrific tragedy was the way they were being treated both at home
and at school. When someone is treated unfairly, or isn’t accepted as
a member of “popular society” they can lash out in violent ways.
They spend their spare time fantasizing about revenge of the people who
have treated them badly, in their emotionally disturbed mind they have
been victimized and they are simply serving out justice. Irate parents
fail to see that no one group can possibly be blamed. The notion that
loud music equals horrible violence is laughable.
There is no proof on either side that music contributes to violence, but
for some reason parents feel content with conjecture and casual
observations. On a subject that affects so many one can’t make rash
judgements. People need to think everything out and rationalize, not
jump at the chance to point blame at something. There are other
circumstances that must be looked at, such as criminal history, mental
status, and family life.
There are some solutions that
fit the needs of both groups; however, no one is willing to give them a
chance. One possible solution is extensive research on the effects of
music in correlation to violence. This research would finally prove
whether or not music does have an effect on human behavior. The tests
would be simple and effective: simply monitor the seritonin, adrenaline,
and testosterone levels in the subject, then interview the subject to
see if his/her behavior has changed. This would finally give people some
evidence with some substance. However, as with all things there is a
slight downfall: these tests would require paid staff willing to do
the work and it would take time for the results to come into view.
Another solution would be to hire a committee to censor the music and
decide whether or not the album should get a warning label. The
committee will be large and diverse; it will mimic a republic with
representatives of different groups. A small group of over protective
and passive aggressive moms is not condemning music upon arrival. If the
music is still in question after the evaluation, the artist will be
asked to come in and explain the meaning of the piece. This gives the
artist say in how his or her music is going to be sold. If the music is
still deemed too violent, it will be given a warning label. The warning
label will cause the cost of the album to go up substantially and it
will be a deterrent to some teens. There will also be age restrictions
placed on "labeled music"; the restrictions will be similar to
going to see an R rated movie. To buy the restricted music, you either
need a parent or guardian to give permission, or you need to be over the
age of 17.
There are downfalls to this
solution as well. Because there will be several different groups in the
committee, there will be conflict and debate. There would be question as
to the guidelines that define violent or mature material. When these
guidelines are finally set, people would debate over weather or they are
fair. Substantial amounts of time would be required to simply find
representatives for the committee. People would not be happy with the
raised prices and restrictions that are placed on labeled music. This
would cause substantial drops in profits for record labels, record
stores, and the artists themselves. And finally artists, stores, and
record labels may not be willing to corporate with the regulations,
defeating the entire purpose. Again the music providers could sue for
loss of profit, as Kathleen O’toole states in her article (based on
the 1998 book from Professor Donald Roberts of Stanford University and
Professor Peter Christenson of Lewis and Clark College, "It's Not
Only Rock & Roll: Popular Music in the Lives of Adolescents"
(Hampton Press Communication Series) by Peter G. Christenson, Donald F.
Roberts) “Labels
warning of explicit lyrics on recordings prompt adolescents in general
to like the music less. They see it as ‘tainted fruit’ rather than
as ‘forbidden fruit’ they must try.”
Teenagers today are caught in the middle of an endless debate with
seemingly no fair solution. Teens are forced to choose between what they
love to do and what they are told to do. From the days of the
“flappers” of the Roaring Twenties to present day’s alternative
rock, music continues to be a catalyst of debate among parents and the
artists behind the music. However people view today’s music, as with
all music throughout history, music in any form has represented
sociological and historical change. In the words of the virtuosos of
rock music “the times they are a-changin. Please get out of the new
one if you can’t lend your hand…” (Bob Dillon: “The
Times They Are a-Changin”)
|
|
Amended References:
Marcus was partly inspired by an article by Kathleen O’toole,
entitled: Rock
& Roll: does it influence teens’ behavior? However, Ms.
O'Toole is not an expert on this subject and was only reporting the
opinions of Professor Donald Roberts and Professor Peter Christension of
Lewis and Clark College, as stated in their 1998 book, "It's
Not Only Rock & Roll: Popular Music in the Lives of Adolescents"
(Hampton Press Communication Series) by Peter G. Christenson, Donald F.
Roberts. (Therefore, please DO NOT quote Kathleen
O'Toole; her full letter is included below)
- From :O'Toole, Kathleen
- Sent : 04 November 2004 16:43:17
- Subject : please revise article
Dear sir or madam "Bibi," Could you please
change an article on your website that is misleading lots of students and
even a few professors? They call me as if I were some expert on pop
music, when, in fact, I am just a journalist/editor who reported in 1997
on some studies conducted by a couple of professors. The citation in your
story should attribute the information to the professors I
quoted or to their book. (I am referring to the article "Teen
Violence and Music: The Real Connection
contributed by Marcus Strife"(Age 16 from Indiana - Written 2001)
located at http://www.musicalenglishlessons.org/contributors/marcusstrife.htm
The base source for the article that your writer, Marcus Strife, quotes
is at this web address:
http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/1997/november12/teenmusic.html
As you will see, the real sources of this information
are listed in that story as: Professor Donald Roberts of Stanford
University and Professor Peter Christenson of Lewis and Clark College, and
their 1998 book, "It's Not Only Rock & Roll: Popular Music
in the Lives of Adolescents" (Hampton Press Communication Series) by
Peter G. Christenson, Donald F. Roberts.
I would very much appreciate it if you could remove the references to me
because that seems to be misleading a lot of people. Please let me know if
you will do this.
Sincerely,
Kathleen O'Toole
Editor, Stanford Business magazine
|
|
|
|
RELATED PAGES
PUBLISHED TESOL ARTICLES by Bibi
Boarder (now Bibi Baxter)
Can you contribute an article or essay on any subject?
Send
it to Bibi. If it is suitable for this website, it
will be published
Return
to the top of this page
|
|
|
| |
|